From Hand-Waving to Hands-On Leadership

Some leaders speak with absolute confidence but offer very little clarity.
They communicate in slogans, headlines, and big statements, not because the work is strategic, but because this is their default mode.

It doesn’t matter whether the topic is AI strategy, a roadmap shift, a bug fix, or a simple user flow.
The pattern is the same:

  • big words,
  • big confidence,
  • and no details.

And the moment you ask how, the answers dissolve into vague gestures and confident phrases that sound important but say nothing.

Everyone nods.
It feels like progress.
But nothing real moves.

This is the gap between hand-waving and leadership, and it shows up far beyond strategy meetings.


The illusion of progress

Hand-waving creates the feeling of momentum.
Meetings are full. People talk in ambitious language. Slides look polished.

But underneath all of it, something is missing:
no one can describe what will actually happen next.

This ties back to the theme in “Why the Best Leaders Keep Asking Why.”
Asking “why” forces clarity.
Hand-waving appears when leaders rely on confidence instead of understanding.


What hand-waving really looks like

The origins are academic, lecturers waving through the parts they can’t explain.
In organizations, it appears everywhere:

  • “We’ll optimize this later.”
  • “We need to rethink the journey.”
  • “Let’s do something with AI.”
  • “We should improve the onboarding flow.”
  • “We need more alignment here.”

These can be legitimate goals, but without detail, they are labels, not direction.

Hand-waving is the performance of leadership without the work of leadership.


Why it happens

Hand-waving comes from two very different places.

1. Pressure and fear

Some leaders feel they must always have an answer.
Pausing feels risky. Saying “I’m not sure yet” feels unacceptable.
So they fill the space with vague, high-confidence statements and hope the details appear later.

2. Arrogance disguised as authority

Others genuinely believe they don’t need to explain themselves.

They assume:

  • details are for the team,
  • their intent is obvious,
  • and everyone should “just understand.”

These are the managers who speak in titles instead of plans:

  • “We need a growth strategy.”
  • “We need a new onboarding experience.”
  • “We need to modernize the platform.”

But they never define what any of these mean. This isn’t pressure, it’s intellectual laziness with a leadership badge on it.

Both patterns lead to the same outcome:
motion without direction.


The cost to the team

When hand-waving becomes part of the culture, the impact is predictable:

  • Trust erodes — teams stop believing the statements.
  • Decisions weaken — assumptions replace shared understanding.
  • Execution slows — because success has no agreed definition.
  • Accountability disappears — no clarity means no ownership.

Everything looks active.
Nothing truly progresses.


Moving from slogans to direction

The opposite of hand-waving isn’t micromanagement. It’s thinking clearly and expressing it clearly.

Strong leaders translate intent into clarity using questions like:

  • What exactly are we trying to do?
  • How will we measure success?
  • What constraints matter?
  • Who owns the outcome?
  • What assumptions are we making?
  • What is still ambiguous?

This isn’t bureaucracy. It’s the foundation for building anything meaningful.

A simple but powerful practice:

Ask the room: “What do we actually know, and what are we assuming?”

  • The conversation changes immediately.
  • Slogans disappear.
  • Decisions emerge.

Confidence matters.
Clarity matters more.

Teams don’t need leaders who talk in headlines.
They need leaders who think, define, align, and build.